- Published on
Rust Practices with Rustlings - Error Handling
Chapter 13 - Error Handling
Exercise 1
pub fn generate_nametag_text(name: String) -> Option<String> {
if name.is_empty() {
// Empty names aren't allowed.
None
} else {
Some(format!("Hi! My name is {}", name))
}
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
#[test]
fn generates_nametag_text_for_a_nonempty_name() {
assert_eq!(
generate_nametag_text("Beyoncé".into()),
Ok("Hi! My name is Beyoncé".into())
);
}
#[test]
fn explains_why_generating_nametag_text_fails() {
assert_eq!(
generate_nametag_text("".into()),
// Don't change this line
Err("`name` was empty; it must be nonempty.".into())
);
}
}
In Rust we have Ok and Err to represent the result of a function.
They are the same as the Option but special for error handling.
pub fn generate_nametag_text(name: String) -> Result<String, String> {
if name.is_empty() {
// Empty names aren't allowed.
Err("`name` was empty; it must be nonempty.".into())
} else {
Ok(format!("Hi! My name is {}", name))
}
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
#[test]
fn generates_nametag_text_for_a_nonempty_name() {
assert_eq!(
generate_nametag_text("Beyoncé".into()),
Ok("Hi! My name is Beyoncé".into())
);
}
#[test]
fn explains_why_generating_nametag_text_fails() {
assert_eq!(
generate_nametag_text("".into()),
// Don't change this line
Err("`name` was empty; it must be nonempty.".into())
);
}
}
Exercise 2
use std::num::ParseIntError;
pub fn total_cost(item_quantity: &str) -> Result<i32, ParseIntError> {
let processing_fee = 1;
let cost_per_item = 5;
let qty = item_quantity.parse::<i32>();
Ok(qty * cost_per_item + processing_fee)
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
#[test]
fn item_quantity_is_a_valid_number() {
assert_eq!(total_cost("34"), Ok(171));
}
#[test]
fn item_quantity_is_an_invalid_number() {
assert_eq!(
total_cost("beep boop").unwrap_err().to_string(),
"invalid digit found in string"
);
}
}
Rust provides the ?
operator to propagate errors. Put it behind a Result value to extract the value inside, or return early if there was an error.
use std::num::ParseIntError;
pub fn total_cost(item_quantity: &str) -> Result<i32, ParseIntError> {
let processing_fee = 1;
let cost_per_item = 5;
let qty = item_quantity.parse::<i32>()?;
Ok(qty * cost_per_item + processing_fee)
}
Exercise 3
// This is a program that is trying to use a completed version of the
// `total_cost` function from the previous exercise. It's not working though!
// Why not? What should we do to fix it?
//
// Execute `rustlings hint errors3` or use the `hint` watch subcommand for a
// hint.
use std::num::ParseIntError;
fn main(){
let mut tokens = 100;
let pretend_user_input = "8";
let cost = total_cost(pretend_user_input)?;
if cost > tokens {
println!("You can't afford that many!");
} else {
tokens -= cost;
println!("You now have {} tokens.", tokens);
}
}
pub fn total_cost(item_quantity: &str) -> Result<i32, ParseIntError> {
let processing_fee = 1;
let cost_per_item = 5;
let qty = item_quantity.parse::<i32>()?;
Ok(qty * cost_per_item + processing_fee)
}
We can use ?
to propagate the error if the function returns a Result type.
And the very interesting thing here is that we can use ?
in the main function, by let the main function returns Result type.
fn main() -> Result<(), ParseIntError> {
let mut tokens = 100;
let pretend_user_input = "8";
let cost = total_cost(pretend_user_input)?;
if cost > tokens {
println!("You can't afford that many!");
} else {
tokens -= cost;
println!("You now have {} tokens.", tokens);
}
return Ok(());
}
Exercise 4
#[derive(PartialEq, Debug)]
struct PositiveNonzeroInteger(u64);
#[derive(PartialEq, Debug)]
enum CreationError {
Negative,
Zero,
}
impl PositiveNonzeroInteger {
fn new(value: i64) -> Result<PositiveNonzeroInteger, CreationError> {
// Hmm... Why is this always returning an Ok value?
Ok(PositiveNonzeroInteger(value as u64))
}
}
#[test]
fn test_creation() {
assert!(PositiveNonzeroInteger::new(10).is_ok());
assert_eq!(
Err(CreationError::Negative),
PositiveNonzeroInteger::new(-10)
);
assert_eq!(Err(CreationError::Zero), PositiveNonzeroInteger::new(0));
}
Hmm... Why is this always returning an Ok value?
Because you write it like that :smile:
Just kidding, we'll modify the function to return the correct value like this:
#[derive(PartialEq, Debug)]
struct PositiveNonzeroInteger(u64);
#[derive(PartialEq, Debug)]
enum CreationError {
Negative,
Zero,
}
impl PositiveNonzeroInteger {
fn new(value: i64) -> Result<PositiveNonzeroInteger, CreationError> {
if value > 0 {
Ok(PositiveNonzeroInteger(value as u64))
} else if value == 0 {
Err(CreationError::Zero)
} else {
Err(CreationError::Negative)
}
}
}
#[test]
fn test_creation() {
assert!(PositiveNonzeroInteger::new(10).is_ok());
assert_eq!(
Err(CreationError::Negative),
PositiveNonzeroInteger::new(-10)
);
assert_eq!(Err(CreationError::Zero), PositiveNonzeroInteger::new(0));
}
Exercise 5
// This exercise uses some concepts that we won't get to until later in the
// course, like `Box` and the `From` trait. It's not important to understand
// them in detail right now, but you can read ahead if you like. For now, think
// of the `Box<dyn ???>` type as an "I want anything that does ???" type, which,
// given Rust's usual standards for runtime safety, should strike you as
// somewhat lenient!
//
// In short, this particular use case for boxes is for when you want to own a
// value and you care only that it is a type which implements a particular
// trait. To do so, The Box is declared as of type Box<dyn Trait> where Trait is
// the trait the compiler looks for on any value used in that context. For this
// exercise, that context is the potential errors which can be returned in a
// Result.
//
// What can we use to describe both errors? In other words, is there a trait
// which both errors implement?
//
use std::error;
use std::fmt;
use std::num::ParseIntError;
// TODO: update the return type of `main()` to make this compile.
fn main() -> Result<(), Box<dyn ???>> {
let pretend_user_input = "42";
let x: i64 = pretend_user_input.parse()?;
println!("output={:?}", PositiveNonzeroInteger::new(x)?);
Ok(())
}
// Don't change anything below this line.
#[derive(PartialEq, Debug)]
struct PositiveNonzeroInteger(u64);
#[derive(PartialEq, Debug)]
enum CreationError {
Negative,
Zero,
}
impl PositiveNonzeroInteger {
fn new(value: i64) -> Result<PositiveNonzeroInteger, CreationError> {
match value {
x if x < 0 => Err(CreationError::Negative),
x if x == 0 => Err(CreationError::Zero),
x => Ok(PositiveNonzeroInteger(x as u64)),
}
}
}
// This is required so that `CreationError` can implement `error::Error`.
impl fmt::Display for CreationError {
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter) -> fmt::Result {
let description = match *self {
CreationError::Negative => "number is negative",
CreationError::Zero => "number is zero",
};
f.write_str(description)
}
}
impl error::Error for CreationError {}
Hey this exercise is really complicated for me as a beginner.
Looking at the hint from Rustlings:
There are two different possible
Result
types produced withinmain()
, which are propagated using?
operators. How do we declare a return type frommain()
that allows both?
Under the hood, the?
operator callsFrom::from
on the error value to convert it to a boxed trait object, aBox<dyn error::Error>
. This boxed trait object is polymorphic, and since all errors implement theerror::Error
trait, we can capture lots of different errors in one "Box" object.
Check out this section of the book:
https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch09-02-recoverable-errors-with-result.html#a-shortcut-for-propagating-errors-the--operator
Read more about boxing errors:
https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/rust-by-example/error/multiple_error_types/boxing_errors.html
Read more about using the?
operator with boxed errors:
https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/rust-by-example/error/multiple_error_types/reenter_question_mark.html
First we need to know about Rust trait. It likes a shared behavior between different types.
Here we have two different types of error: ParseIntError and CreationError. And they share the error::Error trait.
So just put the error::Error trait in the return type of main function to handle multiple error types.
fn main() -> Result<(), Box<dyn error::Error>> {
let pretend_user_input = "42";
let x: i64 = pretend_user_input.parse()?;
println!("output={:?}", PositiveNonzeroInteger::new(x)?);
Ok(())
}
Exercise 6
// Using catch-all error types like `Box<dyn error::Error>` isn't recommended
// for library code, where callers might want to make decisions based on the
// error content, instead of printing it out or propagating it further. Here, we
// define a custom error type to make it possible for callers to decide what to
// do next when our function returns an error.
use std::num::ParseIntError;
// This is a custom error type that we will be using in `parse_pos_nonzero()`.
#[derive(PartialEq, Debug)]
enum ParsePosNonzeroError {
Creation(CreationError),
ParseInt(ParseIntError),
}
impl ParsePosNonzeroError {
fn from_creation(err: CreationError) -> ParsePosNonzeroError {
ParsePosNonzeroError::Creation(err)
}
// TODO: add another error conversion function here.
}
fn parse_pos_nonzero(s: &str) -> Result<PositiveNonzeroInteger, ParsePosNonzeroError> {
// TODO: change this to return an appropriate error instead of panicking
// when `parse()` returns an error.
let x: i64 = s.parse().unwrap();
PositiveNonzeroInteger::new(x).map_err(ParsePosNonzeroError::from_creation)
}
// Don't change anything below this line.
#[derive(PartialEq, Debug)]
struct PositiveNonzeroInteger(u64);
#[derive(PartialEq, Debug)]
enum CreationError {
Negative,
Zero,
}
impl PositiveNonzeroInteger {
fn new(value: i64) -> Result<PositiveNonzeroInteger, CreationError> {
match value {
x if x < 0 => Err(CreationError::Negative),
x if x == 0 => Err(CreationError::Zero),
x => Ok(PositiveNonzeroInteger(x as u64)),
}
}
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod test {
use super::*;
#[test]
fn test_parse_error() {
// We can't construct a ParseIntError, so we have to pattern match.
assert!(matches!(
parse_pos_nonzero("not a number"),
Err(ParsePosNonzeroError::ParseInt(_))
));
}
#[test]
fn test_negative() {
assert_eq!(
parse_pos_nonzero("-555"),
Err(ParsePosNonzeroError::Creation(CreationError::Negative))
);
}
#[test]
fn test_zero() {
assert_eq!(
parse_pos_nonzero("0"),
Err(ParsePosNonzeroError::Creation(CreationError::Zero))
);
}
#[test]
fn test_positive() {
let x = PositiveNonzeroInteger::new(42);
assert!(x.is_ok());
assert_eq!(parse_pos_nonzero("42"), Ok(x.unwrap()));
}
}
Looking at the first TODO, we'll add another error conversion function here.
fn from_parseint(err: ParseIntError) -> ParsePosNonzeroError {
ParsePosNonzeroError::ParseInt(err)
}
At the second TODO, we'll change this to return an appropriate error instead of panicking when parse()
returns an error.
We have an example of how to do it with map_err, so just do it and using ?
operator to propagate the result.
fn parse_pos_nonzero(s: &str) -> Result<PositiveNonzeroInteger, ParsePosNonzeroError> {
// TODO: change this to return an appropriate error instead of panicking
// when `parse()` returns an error.
let x: i64 = s.parse().map_err(ParsePosNonzeroError::from_creation).unwrap();
PositiveNonzeroInteger::new(x).map_err(ParsePosNonzeroError::from_creation)
}
Conclusion
The 13th chapter of Rustlings - Hash Maps ends here.
TIL:
- How to handle error in Rust
- This chapter is pretty complicated with a lot of new concepts. Read the related links here carefully.
- Error Handlings chapter: https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch09-02-recoverable-errors-with-result.html#a-shortcut-for-propagating-errors-the--operator
- Boxing errors: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/rust-by-example/error/multiple_error_types/boxing_errors.html
?
operator: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/rust-by-example/error/multiple_error_types/reenter_question_mark.html
Thanks for reading and please add comments below if you have any questions